The demand for mobile applications has long exceeded the supply of professional developers
So it’s no wonder that companies are increasingly turning to low-code and no-code platforms, which enable employees without in-depth IT and programming knowledge to create applications. But what are the differences between the two approaches?
In this blog post, we explain the key differences between low-code and no-code platforms. We also explain when you should opt for which of the two variants depending on your requirements.
No-code: Potential and limits
With the no-code development approach, practically no programming knowledge is required. Without a single line of code and using only drag & drop, simple applications can be created at top speed. This may sound promising at first. However, when it comes to individual adjustments, integration options or ensuring data quality, no-code tools quickly reach their limits:
- Flexibility and functionality: This approach is primarily suitable for simple use cases, i.e. smaller apps that are only to be used in a single department. No-code tools are often manufacturer-specific and therefore limited to certain functions. Individual extensions or integrations are rarely supported.
- Integration options and scalability: The focus of the use cases is on increasing operational efficiency. At the same time, the user experience takes a back seat.
- IT governance: A particular challenge when dealing with no-code development tools is the issue of IT governance. Due to the independent nature of no-code applications, the data structures often vary or are not managed at all.
Low-code: From drag & drop to coding
With this approach, too, the low programming effort accelerates the time-to-market of an application: low-code platforms offer simple no-code functionalities, such as the modeling of processes or graphical modules for creating the interface. In addition, however, custom code can also be added manually in such a development environment for individual extensions.
Apps developed using the low-code approach can also be better integrated into the existing IT infrastructure. Scalable architectures make it easier to harmonize the application with the requirements of IT governance. The IT department retains control over all applications and data streams and provides support with defined framework parameters.
Comparison between low-code and no-code
| Low-Code | No-Code |
|---|---|
| Low programming effort | No programming effort |
| IT governance remains with the IT department | Risk of uncontrolled shadow IT |
| Scalable applications | Simple applications |
| High flexibility for individual requirements | Access to predefined modules |
| Operation in public cloud, private cloud or on-premise | Operation in manufacturer-specific public cloud |
Conclusion: low-code or no-code?
The question of which of the two approaches is preferable depends on the type and scope of the applications and the size of the company. While no-code platforms lead quickly and easily to the finished app, complex use cases can only be supported with a low-code platform.
